Who carries what: spending competence, country by country, module by module

Each cell measures the share of the module's spending carried by each tier: defence is national everywhere, health and education change tier from one country to another.

Country · reference city	Defence	Health	Education	Social	Sécurité	Transport	Economy	Loisirs	Debt (int.)	Admin
Argentina réf.: Buenos Aires	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 84% Local 84% · National 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 85% Local 85% · National 15%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 79% National 79% · Local 21%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 86% Local 86% · National 14%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 58% + Local 42% National 58% · Local 42%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Local 72% Local 72% · National 28%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 100% Local 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 82% National 82% · Local 18%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 81% Local 81% · National 19%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Austria réf.: Vienna	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 86% National 86% · State/Prov. 14%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 77% National 77% · State/Prov. 23%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 5% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 7% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 73% National 73% · State/Prov. 18% · Local 8%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 70% National 70% · State/Prov. 30%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 75% National 75% · State/Prov. 24% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Australia réf.: Brisbane	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 54% + National 46% État/Prov. 54% · National 46%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	État/Prov. 60% State/Prov. 60% · National 40%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 84% National 84% · State/Prov. 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 83% State/Prov. 83% · National 17%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 76% State/Prov. 76% · National 24%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 60% National 60% · State/Prov. 40%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 59% + National 41% État/Prov. 59% · National 41%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 72% National 72% · State/Prov. 28%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 84% National 84% · State/Prov. 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Brazil réf.: São Paulo	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 49% + National 28% + State/Prov. 23% Local 49% · National 28% · État/Prov. 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 46% + State/Prov. 36% + National 18% Local 46% · État/Prov. 36% · National 18%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 76% National 76% · Local 17% · State/Prov. 8%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 66% State/Prov. 66% · National 17% · Local 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 61% Local 61% · State/Prov. 32% · National 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 61% Local 61% · National 31% · State/Prov. 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 72% Local 72% · State/Prov. 18% · National 10%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 54% + State/Prov. 39% National 54% · État/Prov. 39% · Local 6%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 75% National 75% · State/Prov. 15% · Local 10%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Canada réf.: Toronto	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	État/Prov. 96% State/Prov. 96% · Local 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 100% State/Prov. 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 50% + State/Prov. 28% + Local 22% National 50% · État/Prov. 28% · Local 22%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 56% + State/Prov. 44% Local 56% · État/Prov. 44%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Local 68% Local 68% · State/Prov. 32%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 53% + State/Prov. 34% National 53% · État/Prov. 34% · Local 13%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Local 61% Local 61% · State/Prov. 39%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 52% + State/Prov. 48% National 52% · État/Prov. 48%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 50% + National 26% + Local 25% État/Prov. 50% · National 26% · Local 25%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Switzerland réf.: Zürich	National 96% National 96% · State/Prov. 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 53% + Local 38% National 53% · Local 38% · État/Prov. 9%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 41% + National 37% + State/Prov. 22% Local 41% · National 37% · État/Prov. 22%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 72% National 72% · Local 21% · State/Prov. 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 46% + National 41% Local 46% · National 41% · État/Prov. 13%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 46% + Local 40% National 46% · Local 40% · État/Prov. 14%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 41% + Local 36% + State/Prov. 23% National 41% · Local 36% · État/Prov. 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 52% + National 26% + State/Prov. 22% Local 52% · National 26% · État/Prov. 22%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 76% National 76% · State/Prov. 24%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 46% + Local 43% National 46% · Local 43% · État/Prov. 11%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Chile réf.: Puente Alto	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	National 84% National 84% · Local 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 80% National 80% · Local 20%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	National 85% National 85% · Local 15%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Colombie réf.: Bogotá	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 94% National 94% · State/Prov. 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 64% State/Prov. 64% · National 36%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 91% National 91% · State/Prov. 8% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 94% National 94% · State/Prov. 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 55% + State/Prov. 45% National 55% · État/Prov. 45%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 74% National 74% · State/Prov. 26%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 55% + National 45% État/Prov. 55% · National 45%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 86% National 86% · Local 9% · State/Prov. 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 81% National 81% · Local 12% · State/Prov. 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Czechia réf.: Praha	National 99% National 99% · Local 1% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 81% National 81% · State/Prov. 17% · Local 2%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 44% + State/Prov. 43% Local 44% · État/Prov. 43% · National 13%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 89% National 89% · State/Prov. 6% · Local 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 74% National 74% · Local 17% · State/Prov. 9%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 51% + National 26% + State/Prov. 23% Local 51% · National 26% · État/Prov. 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 41% + National 34% + State/Prov. 25% Local 41% · National 34% · État/Prov. 25%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 43% + Local 30% + National 27% État/Prov. 43% · Local 30% · National 27%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 93% National 93% · State/Prov. 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 43% + Local 34% + State/Prov. 23% National 43% · Local 34% · État/Prov. 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Germany réf.: Berlin	National 100% National 100% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 73% State/Prov. 73% · National 27%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 85% National 85% · State/Prov. 15% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 68% State/Prov. 68% · National 31% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 47% + State/Prov. 46% National 47% · État/Prov. 46% · Local 7%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 53% + State/Prov. 47% National 53% · État/Prov. 47%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 67% State/Prov. 67% · National 33% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Denmark réf.: Copenhague	National 100% National 100% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 80% State/Prov. 80% · Local 16% · National 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 54% + Local 46% National 54% · Local 46%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 54% + Local 46% National 54% · Local 46% · État/Prov. 1%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 62% National 62% · Local 38%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 50% + National 47% Local 50% · National 47% · État/Prov. 4%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 79% National 79% · Local 20% · State/Prov. 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Estonia réf.: Tallinn	National 97% National 97% · Local 3% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 79% National 79% · State/Prov. 21%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 59% + National 41% État/Prov. 59% · National 41%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 92% National 92% · Local 7% · State/Prov. 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 67% National 67% · State/Prov. 33%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 42% + National 39% + State/Prov. 19% Local 42% · National 39% · État/Prov. 19%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 61% National 61% · State/Prov. 39%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 83% National 83% · State/Prov. 17%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 88% National 88% · State/Prov. 10% · Local 2%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Spain réf.: Madrid	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 99% National 99% · State/Prov. 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 97% National 97% · State/Prov. 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 77% National 77% · State/Prov. 22% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 58% + State/Prov. 42% National 58% · État/Prov. 42%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 64% National 64% · State/Prov. 22% · Local 14%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 58% + National 42% État/Prov. 58% · National 42%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 97% National 97% · State/Prov. 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 57% + National 43% État/Prov. 57% · National 43% · Local 0%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Finland réf.: Helsinki	National 98% National 98% · Local 2%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 81% State/Prov. 81% · National 19% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 41% + Local 38% + National 21% État/Prov. 41% · Local 38% · National 21%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 75% National 75% · State/Prov. 25% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 81% National 81% · State/Prov. 17% · Local 2%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 42% + State/Prov. 31% + National 26% Local 42% · État/Prov. 31% · National 26%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 53% + Local 31% + State/Prov. 16% National 53% · Local 31% · État/Prov. 16%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 45% + Local 31% + National 23% État/Prov. 45% · Local 31% · National 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 79% National 79% · State/Prov. 21%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 41% + Local 31% + State/Prov. 27% National 41% · Local 31% · État/Prov. 27%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
France réf.: Paris	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 77% National 77% · Local 22% · State/Prov. 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 59% + State/Prov. 26% + Local 15% National 59% · État/Prov. 26% · Local 15%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 8% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 63% National 63% · Local 22% · State/Prov. 15%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 42% + Local 31% + National 27% État/Prov. 42% · Local 31% · National 27%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 38% + State/Prov. 31% + Local 31% National 38% · État/Prov. 31% · Local 31%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 43% + Local 37% + National 20% État/Prov. 43% · Local 37% · National 20%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 90% National 90% · State/Prov. 10%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 43% + State/Prov. 36% + Local 20% National 43% · État/Prov. 36% · Local 20%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Croatia réf.: Zagreb	National 100% National 100% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 75% National 75% · State/Prov. 24% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 58% + National 30% État/Prov. 58% · National 30% · Local 12%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 94% National 94% · State/Prov. 3% · Local 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 6% · Local 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 53% + Local 31% + State/Prov. 16% National 53% · Local 31% · État/Prov. 16%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 49% + National 39% Local 49% · National 39% · État/Prov. 12%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 50% + State/Prov. 27% + Local 23% National 50% · État/Prov. 27% · Local 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 3% · Local 2%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 43% + State/Prov. 34% + Local 23% National 43% · État/Prov. 34% · Local 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Ireland réf.: Dublin	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 99% National 99% · State/Prov. 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 88% National 88% · State/Prov. 12%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 90% National 90% · State/Prov. 10% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 51% + State/Prov. 34% + Local 15% National 51% · État/Prov. 34% · Local 15%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 53% + National 38% Local 53% · National 38% · État/Prov. 9%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 43% + Local 35% + State/Prov. 22% National 43% · Local 35% · État/Prov. 22%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 94% National 94% · State/Prov. 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 84% National 84% · State/Prov. 11% · Local 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Israel réf.: Jérusalem	National 100% National 100% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 99% National 99% · Local 0% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 65% National 65% · State/Prov. 21% · Local 15%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 5% · Local 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 87% National 87% · Local 9% · State/Prov. 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 84% National 84% · State/Prov. 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 51% + State/Prov. 27% + Local 22% National 51% · État/Prov. 27% · Local 22%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 51% + State/Prov. 32% + Local 17% National 51% · État/Prov. 32% · Local 17%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 99% National 99% · State/Prov. 1% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 69% National 69% · State/Prov. 23% · Local 8%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Iceland réf.: Reykjavík	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 99% National 99% · State/Prov. 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 51% + National 49% État/Prov. 51% · National 49%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 84% National 84% · State/Prov. 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 89% National 89% · State/Prov. 11%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 67% National 67% · State/Prov. 33%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 86% National 86% · State/Prov. 14%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 60% + National 40% État/Prov. 60% · National 40%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 91% National 91% · State/Prov. 9%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 77% National 77% · State/Prov. 23%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Italy réf.: Rome	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 85% National 85% · Local 15%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 90% National 90% · Local 10%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 81% National 81% · Local 19%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 51% + National 49% Local 51% · National 49%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 70% National 70% · Local 30%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 73% National 73% · Local 27%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 76% National 76% · Local 24%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Japan réf.: Tokyo	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 79% National 79% · Local 21%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 62% Local 62% · National 38%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 61% National 61% · Local 39%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 93% Local 93% · National 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 56% + National 44% Local 56% · National 44%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	National 87% National 87% · Local 13%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 58% + Local 42% National 58% · Local 42%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
South Korea réf.: Seoul	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 90% National 90% · State/Prov. 9% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 46% + National 43% État/Prov. 46% · National 43% · Local 11%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 61% National 61% · State/Prov. 28% · Local 11%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 75% National 75% · State/Prov. 17% · Local 8%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 100% Local 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 47% + State/Prov. 42% National 47% · État/Prov. 42% · Local 11%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 49% + National 37% État/Prov. 49% · National 37% · Local 15%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	National 71% National 71% · State/Prov. 24% · Local 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Lithuania réf.: Vilnius	National 93% National 93% · Local 7% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 75% National 75% · State/Prov. 25%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 63% State/Prov. 63% · National 37%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 93% National 93% · State/Prov. 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 90% National 90% · Local 6% · State/Prov. 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 69% National 69% · State/Prov. 31%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 46% + National 30% + State/Prov. 24% Local 46% · National 30% · État/Prov. 24%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 52% + State/Prov. 48% National 52% · État/Prov. 48%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 8%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 81% National 81% · State/Prov. 18% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Latvia réf.: Rīga	National 96% National 96% · Local 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 82% National 82% · State/Prov. 17% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 47% + State/Prov. 33% + National 20% Local 47% · État/Prov. 33% · National 20%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 85% National 85% · Local 10% · State/Prov. 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 88% National 88% · Local 8% · State/Prov. 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 71% National 71% · State/Prov. 29%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 64% Local 64% · National 27% · State/Prov. 9%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 47% + State/Prov. 31% + Local 22% National 47% · État/Prov. 31% · Local 22%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 81% National 81% · State/Prov. 19%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 56% + Local 38% National 56% · Local 38% · État/Prov. 6%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Mexico réf.: Monterrey	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	National 91% National 91% · State/Prov. 6% · Local 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap
Netherlands réf.: Amsterdam	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 56% + National 44% Local 56% · National 44%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 90% National 90% · Local 10%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 76% National 76% · Local 24%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 76% National 76% · Local 24% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 51% + Local 44% National 51% · Local 44% · État/Prov. 5%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 52% + National 45% Local 52% · National 45% · État/Prov. 3%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Local 70% Local 70% · National 29% · State/Prov. 2%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 78% National 78% · Local 21% · State/Prov. 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Norway réf.: Oslo	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 56% + Local 32% National 56% · Local 32% · État/Prov. 12%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 46% + State/Prov. 36% + National 18% Local 46% · État/Prov. 36% · National 18%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 69% National 69% · State/Prov. 23% · Local 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 77% National 77% · State/Prov. 13% · Local 9%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 53% + State/Prov. 41% National 53% · État/Prov. 41% · Local 7%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 47% + State/Prov. 34% + Local 18% National 47% · État/Prov. 34% · Local 18%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 37% + National 35% + Local 28% État/Prov. 37% · National 35% · Local 28%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared National 60% + State/Prov. 40% National 60% · État/Prov. 40%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 73% National 73% · State/Prov. 20% · Local 7%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
New Zealand réf.: Wellington	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Poland réf.: Warszawa	National 100% National 100% · Local 0% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 55% + State/Prov. 42% National 55% · État/Prov. 42% · Local 3%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 47% + State/Prov. 39% Local 47% · État/Prov. 39% · National 14%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 86% National 86% · State/Prov. 8% · Local 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 79% National 79% · Local 12% · State/Prov. 10%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 50% + State/Prov. 27% + National 23% Local 50% · État/Prov. 27% · National 23%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 42% + National 39% + State/Prov. 19% Local 42% · National 39% · État/Prov. 19%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 43% + Local 40% + National 18% État/Prov. 43% · Local 40% · National 18%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 84% National 84% · State/Prov. 11% · Local 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 45% + National 32% + State/Prov. 22% Local 45% · National 32% · État/Prov. 22%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Portugal réf.: Lisboa	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 94% National 94% · State/Prov. 6%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 78% National 78% · State/Prov. 22%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 8% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 77% National 77% · State/Prov. 23%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 44% + State/Prov. 31% + Local 26% National 44% · État/Prov. 31% · Local 26%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 56% + National 44% État/Prov. 56% · National 44%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 5%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 51% + State/Prov. 48% National 51% · État/Prov. 48% · Local 1%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE
Sweden réf.: Stockholm	National 98% National 98% · State/Prov. 1% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 97% State/Prov. 97% · National 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 80% State/Prov. 80% · National 20%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 64% National 64% · State/Prov. 36%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 87% National 87% · State/Prov. 12% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 51% + National 49% État/Prov. 51% · National 49%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared État/Prov. 47% + National 42% État/Prov. 47% · National 42% · Local 11%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	État/Prov. 72% State/Prov. 72% · National 28%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 53% + State/Prov. 47% National 53% · État/Prov. 47%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 85% National 85% · State/Prov. 14% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Singapore réf.: Singapore	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap
Slovenia réf.: Ljubljana	National 99% National 99% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 85% National 85% · State/Prov. 14% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared État/Prov. 45% + National 37% + Local 17% État/Prov. 45% · National 37% · Local 17%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 4% · Local 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 83% National 83% · Local 8% · State/Prov. 8%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 62% National 62% · Local 22% · State/Prov. 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 53% + Local 26% + State/Prov. 21% National 53% · Local 26% · État/Prov. 21%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Shared Local 44% + State/Prov. 31% + National 25% Local 44% · État/Prov. 31% · National 25%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 92% National 92% · State/Prov. 4% · Local 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 70% National 70% · State/Prov. 17% · Local 14%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
Slovaquie réf.: Bratislava	National 97% National 97% · Local 3% · State/Prov. 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 96% National 96% · State/Prov. 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	État/Prov. 63% State/Prov. 63% · National 37%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 96% National 96% · State/Prov. 4%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 95% National 95% · State/Prov. 4% · Local 1%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 72% National 72% · State/Prov. 28%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 51% + Local 33% + State/Prov. 16% National 51% · Local 33% · État/Prov. 16%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	National 62% National 62% · State/Prov. 38%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 97% National 97% · State/Prov. 3%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 68% National 68% · State/Prov. 31% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
United Kingdom réf.: London	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap	not published cause absente de the allocation published: named gap
United States réf.: New York City	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 69% National 69% · Local 22% · State/Prov. 9%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 87% Local 87% · State/Prov. 13%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 56% + State/Prov. 35% National 56% · État/Prov. 35% · Local 9%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Local 71% Local 71% · State/Prov. 18% · National 11%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 66% Local 66% · State/Prov. 20% · National 14%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared Local 56% + National 28% + State/Prov. 16% Local 56% · National 28% · État/Prov. 16%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Local 86% Local 86% · State/Prov. 14%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 61% National 61% · Local 30% · State/Prov. 8%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 70% Local 70% · State/Prov. 20% · National 10%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page
South Africa réf.: Johannesburg	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100% · Local 0%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 98% National 98% · Local 2%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Shared National 58% + Local 42% National 58% · Local 42%: no Tier ≥ 60%: compétence PARTAGÉE	Local 83% Local 83% · National 17%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	National 100% National 100%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page	Local 84% Local 84% · National 16%: share of spending measured in the reference city, same figures as its allocation page

Lignes des répartitions HORS colonnes (nommées, never cachées): AFFÄRSVERKSAMHET, TOTALT · Purchases of non-financial assets · Administration · Afskriftir · Infrastructure depreciation · Infrastructure depreciation (city) · Annar rekstrarkostnaður · Aquisição de bens de capital · Aquisição de bens e serviços · Avalik kord ja julgeolek · Goods and services (Sachaufwand) (MVAG 222) · Capital grant expenses · Financial charges (MVAG 224) · Depreciation and amortisation · Depreciation and amortisation expense · Despesas com o pessoal · Disbursements outside ministry budgets: NAMED perimeter gap · Direct federal spending (defence, RCMP, borders, departments) · Spending de Berlin - breakdown coming soon · Dépenses du GLA Group: ventilation coming soon · Municipal spending: breakdown forthcoming · PUBLIC SPENDING UK outside GLA: breakdown coming soon · Elamu- ja kommunaalmajandus · Employee costs · Expenditure on operating activities · Finance costs · Finance expense · Finančné náklady · Fjármunatekjur og fjármagnsgjöld, nettó · Financial functions / non ventilables · Haridus · Hlutdeild minnihluta í tapi · Hlutdeild í tapi hlutdeildarfélaga · INFRASTRUKTUR, SKYDD m.m., TOTALT · Juros e outros encargos · KULTUR OCH FRITID, TOTALT · Keskkonnakaitse · Laun og launatengd gjöld án gjaldfærslu lífeyrisframlaga · Loss on disposal of non-current assets · Majandus · Materials and services · Náklady na transfery a náklady z odvodu príjmov · Odpisy, rezervy a opravné položky z prevádzkovej činnosti a finančnej činnosti a zúčtovanie časového rozlíšenia · Osobné náklady · Ostatné náklady na prevádzkovú činnosť · Other expenses · Outras despesas correntes · PEDAGOGISK VERKSAMHET, TOTALT · POLITISK VERKSAMHET, TOTALT · Passivos financeiros · Personnel (MVAG 221) · Refinancement de la dette (principal roulé, named) · Riigikaitse · Debt service (principal inclus) · Služby · Social (Social Development) · Sotsiaalne kaitse · Spotrebované nákupy · Subsídios · SÄRSKILT RIKTADE INSATSER, TOTALT · Security and external relations · Tekjuskattur · Tervishoid · Transfers to the development budget (תב"ר) · Transfers to local governments · Transfers to municipalities & boroughs (named) · Transfers to Indigenous governments (StatCan) · Transfers paid (MVAG 223) · Transfers to other governments · Transferências correntes · Transferências de capital · Vaba aeg, kultuur ja religioon · VÅRD OCH OMSORG, TOTALT · ESA statistical discrepancy (identified) · Gap statistique Eurostat (TE − Σ COFOG) · Economy (Economic Development) · Üldised valitsussektori teenused.

Generated from published breakdowns, at every publication: a mandatory check crosses each cell to the city's breakdown; a cell and the breakdown page cannot contradict each other. Missing countries = no published city yet with a breakdown (see Coverage).